`lodi`

and an example datasetFor convenience we have included a example dataset called `toy_data`

, which can be loaded by running `data("toy_data")`

. Let’s look at the first 10 entries of the example dataset.

```
library(lodi)
data("toy_data")
head(toy_data, n = 10)
#> id case_cntrl poll smoking gender batch1 lod
#> 1 13707 1 3.588607 0 1 0 0.65
#> 2 18641 1 NA 0 0 0 0.65
#> 3 27407 1 2.619124 1 0 0 0.65
#> 4 45462 1 7.203193 0 1 1 0.80
#> 5 50357 1 7.336160 1 1 1 0.80
#> 6 59168 1 NA 0 0 0 0.65
#> 7 61477 1 5.136974 0 1 0 0.65
#> 8 76585 1 11.794483 1 1 0 0.65
#> 9 80681 1 1.280289 0 0 1 0.80
#> 10 84391 1 5.480510 1 1 0 0.65
```

`id`

corresponds to the study ID and is unimportant for the purposes of this example. `case_cntrl`

takes values 0 or 1, where 1 indicates that the subject has the disease of interest and 0 indicates that the subject is a healthy control. `poll`

is the environmental exposure of interest, where `NA`

indicates that the concentration is below the limit of detection (LOD). `smoking`

and `gender`

are covariates that we will include in the imputation model. `lod`

corresponds to the limit of detection for each individual’s batch. Finally, `batch1`

takes two values; 1 if the subject’s biosample was assayed in batch 1 and 0 if the subject’s biosample was assayed in batch 2.

The function that performs censored likelihood multiple imputation is the `clmi`

function. For more details see `help(clmi)`

.

```
clmi.out <- clmi(formula = log(poll) ~ case_cntrl + smoking + gender,
df = toy_data, lod = lod, seed = 12345, n.imps = 5)
#> [1] "Formula: log(poll) ~ case_cntrl + smoking + gender"
#> [1] "Exposure variable: poll"
#> [1] "Outcome variable: case_cntrl"
#> [1] "Transformation function: function (x) log(x)"
#> [1] "LOD variable: lod"
```

The main input to `clmi`

is a R formula. The left hand side of the formula must be the exposure, and the right hand side must be the outcome followed by the covariates you want to include in the imputation model. The order of variables on the right hand side matters. You can apply a transformation to the exposure by applying a univariate function to it, as done above. The `lod`

argument refers to the name of the lod variable in your data.frame.

The imputed datasets can be extracted as a list using `$imputed.dfs`

:

`extract.imputed.dfs <- clmi.out$imputed.dfs`

The `pool.clmi`

function takes the output generated by the `clmi`

function, fits outcome models on each of the imputed datasets, and pools inference across outcome models using Rubin’s rules. For details see `help(pool.clmi)`

.

```
results <- pool.clmi(formula = case_cntrl ~ poll_transform_imputed + smoking +
gender, clmi.out = clmi.out, type = logistic)
```

In `pool.clmi`

, `formula`

contains the outcome variable on the left hand side and the first variable on the right hand side should be the imputed exposure variable. `clmi`

outputs the exposure variable as `((your-exposure))_transform_imputed`

. In this example, our exposure is `poll`

, so the name of the imputed variable is `poll_transform_imputed`

.

- Note: There are two valid options for the
`type`

argument. If you have binary outcome data (as in the current example) use`type = logistic`

so that the model fit on the imputed datasets are logistic regression models. If you have continuous outcome data use`regression.type = linear`

so that models fit on the imputed datasets are linear regression models.

To display the pooled results use `$output`

:

```
results$output
#> est se df p.values
#> (Intercept) -0.6021170 0.3338018 93.75401 0.07447174
#> poll_transform_imputed 0.3619248 0.2192222 86.31951 0.10238282
#> smoking -0.3245071 0.5245760 93.01358 0.53768641
#> gender 0.8611230 0.4904712 93.65164 0.08240830
#> LCL.95 UCL.95
#> (Intercept) -1.26491087 0.06067689
#> poll_transform_imputed -0.07385157 0.79770117
#> smoking -1.36620905 0.71719487
#> gender -0.11276635 1.83501228
```

If you want to look at the individual regressions fit on each imputed dataset use `$regression.summaries`

`results$regression.summaries`

Boss J, Mukherjee B, Ferguson KK, et al. Estimating outcome-exposure associations when exposure biomarker detection limits vary across batches. *Epidemiology*. 2019;30(5):746-755. 10.1097/EDE.0000000000001052

If you would like to report a bug in the code, ask questions, or send requests/suggestions e-mail Jonathan Boss at `[email protected]`

.